Garth Brooks wants his $500k hospital donation back. Justifiable or sour grapes?

Background:

posted by Rebecca

7509

Country music superstar Garth Brooks donated $500,000 to Integris Canadian Valley Regional Hospital in Yukon, OK, but now he wants his donation back. He alleges that the hospital promised to name a new series of building additions after his mother, who died of cancer in 1999. However, after the hospital received the donation, they said Brooks' mother's name would not be used and refused to return the donation when he asked for it back. Now Brooks is suing the hospital for being misled.

Do you side with Garth Brooks on this one or do you think he's being petty? On one hand, the hospital promised to name the buildings after his mother but changed their minds, so they kind of duped him into donating money under false pretenses. On the other hand, asking for your donation back can seem kind of petty and greedy. Who do you side with, Garth or the hospital?

Debate It! 7

That is legally justifiable. A business deal is a business deal. If you donate money to anyone with the agreement being "only if you do this for me" and you don't do it, then that is breach of contract no matter how you slice it.

In this case, I don't find it petty or greedy since he was looking for a way to honor his mother and this sounds less like a donation and more like a business agreement to give his mother a lasting memory.

Honestly, what does the hospital have against naming the buildings after his mother? That sounds like a small price to pay to pick up a half million in cash.

Posted By Writtenin1981,

I agree. It seems like he donated the money based on what the hospital promised him and then they backed out of the agreement. Sucks for Garth Brooks--like you said, it's not a big deal to name a building after his mom.

Posted By Rebecca,

i agree that it IS legally justifiable..but donating money for any other purpose then to help an organization..even if it is so that they name a couple of buildings after you're mother...is selfish. its like,,,donating a dollar or so at mcdonalds just so people can see you're name on the wall. that's not what donation should be about. it should be about helping out, not being recognized for you're good deeds.

Posted By jonaheim88,

besides....the guys a damn millionaire. go donate to another hospital..maybe they will self serve you.

Posted By jonaheim88,

Millionaire or not, if you give money to an organization with a stipulation attached to it that they agree to accommodate, and then they refuse to do it, you have every right to demand your money back. They failed to follow through on their agreement.

Elvis Presley went through this with his own home town. In fact, it was because of that incident that he disowned Tupelo. He donated a boat load of money for Tupelo to improve one of their city parks. His only stipulation was that they had to take part of the money and specifically build a guitar shaped swimming pool.

The city built the pool, but refused to make it into a guitar shape. Elvis got angry over this because that was his one specific demand was to make it guitar shaped. As a result of what he saw as them taking his money and then not following through on their end of the bargain, Elvis refused to ever acknowledge Tupelo again. Even when he lived in Memphis, when asked he would say he was from Tupelo. After this incident, however, he would say he was from Memphis.

Posted By Writtenin1981,

And on a side note, $500,000 is not chump change to anyone, including millionaires. If they are going to put down half a million on anything, they expect their money to be used for the purpose that was agreed to.

Posted By Writtenin1981,

I think he deserves to have the money back! I agree that a half a mill is a lot of money and he should be able to decide what happens with it.

- Jenny
Edited:03-30-2012 12:34PM by ThisOrThat
Reason:removed link

Posted By pregnancyweekbyweek,

Make a Comment

You must be signed in to add a comment. login | register
Username
view profile
You are now following
a
You are no longer following
a
 
test message
×